Rhetorical+Analysis+Project

[|project handout.pdf]

Student Projects Micki Steven Dipin and Aman Ewa and Karolina Florida, Marlon and Molly Monique, Erick and Louie Marika and Michelle Danny and Khaja Christina in a **//sophisticated//** way and previews reasons to the answer. || Thesis answers the question of how the speeches are similar/dissimilar in a **//reasonable//** way and previews reasons to the answer. || Thesis answers the question of how the speeches are similar/ dissimilar in an **//average//** way and previews reasons to the answer. || Thesis **//attempts//** to answer the question of how the speeches are similar/dissimilar but might not be clear or give an overview of reasons. || Thesis **//does not answer//** the question of how the speeches are similar/ dissimilar or is so poorly worded as to be unclear. || || The five rhetorical elements are **//accurately and fluently//** **identified and analyzed and includes** correct definitions and excellent analysis of **rhetorical devices**. || The five rhetorical elements are **//mostly//** **identified and analyzed and includes** correct definitions and good analysis of **rhetorical devices**. || A **//decent attempt//** is made to **locate** the five rhetorical elements and define and analyze **rhetorical devices**. || A **//weak attempt//** is made to **locate** the five rhetorical elements and define and analyze **rhetorical devices**. || **// No attempt //** is made to **locate** the five rhetorical elements and define and analyze **rhetorical devices**. || · ** plurals and possessives: s versus ’s and s’ ** · ** it ’ s (it i s)/its ** · ** there/their ** · ** where/were ** · ** woman when you mean women ** · ** subject-verb agreement ** · ** use of first or second person voice ** · ** misspell my name, your name, or any of the characters’ names ** || Font formats and images (color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.. || Font formats and images have been carefully planned to enhance readability.and ideas,. || Font formatting and images have been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read or images may not be strongly linked. || Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material and/or images do not show a clear relation to content. || No project. ||
 * || ** (A) ** || ** (B) ** || ** (C) ** || ** (D) ** || ** (F) ** ||
 * **__ Thesis __**
 * answers the question of how the speeches are similar/dissimilar **
 * (10 points) ** || Thesis answers the question of how the speeches are similar/dissimilar
 * **__ PATTR Support and Analysis __**
 * locates examples of rhetoric: **
 * ethos, pathos, and logos and rhetorical devices with definitions **
 * (50 points) **
 * ** Format and Editing **
 * (10 points) **
 * CRIMES for which you get an automatic 0: **
 * **__ Dramatic Recordings __**
 * (30 points) ** || Recordings show a strong interpretation of the writer’s Purpose, Audience, and Tone. Recordings are edited expertly. || Recordings attempt some vocal flair, but do not feature the Purpose, Audience or Tone in an exemplary way. || Recordings accurately feature P, A an T, but are underdeveloped. || Not enough attention is paid to P, A or T in the recordings. || No presentation. ||
 * __ Total /100 Points __**